#How to take a screenshot on mac 10 license#

and sometimes to young creatives at the beginning of their career, whose work is not properly protected from copyright breach. The article works to protect creatives from the misuse of their online content, but might along the way kill our beloved meme culture.Р”Р‡rom BeyoncР“В© stuck in a desperate twerk on our Twitter feed, to young Mary Kate (or Ashley) Olsen infinitely lifting a thumbs accompanied by РІР‚Сљyou got it dudeРІР‚Сњ, our meme culture, sometimes to our oblivion, is wholeheartedly reliant on the recycling of content content that sometimes belongs to Warner Bros.

#How to take a screenshot on mac 10 license#

Article 11, monikered the РІР‚Сљhyperlink taxРІР‚Сњ, grants publishers the right to license their news articles when they are shared by other online platforms, and article 13, dubbed РІР‚Сљthe death of memesРІР‚Сњ or the РІР‚Сљupload killerРІР‚Сњ, says that online platforms are liable for content uploaded by users that infringes copyright.

While the legislation is still in the works, there are two particular claws that have sent the internet into a fearful paralysis. But at the same time, critics of the Copyright Directive have deemed the law as yet another step towards the death of the internet. Granted, some have praised the new legislation as groundbreaking for young creatives and companies as it (somewhat) shields them from Facebook, Twitter and Google profiting from the engagement of image sharing, meme culture and news sharing on their platforms. Thing is, itРІР‚в„ўs not exactly easy to determine what copyright means in the digital world of image hyperlinking, reposting, quoting and memes and, more importantly, who gets to profit from this culture. Earlier this month the European Parliament approved a number of new amendments to the highly criticised and controversial EU Copyright Directive, an extensive piece of legislation that works to tackle copyright infringement online.